Motivation of Cain

I was always under the belief that Cain and Abel was a tragic story. As seen in Genesis 4, the two brothers were giving up what they could offer. For Abel, this was a fat sheep, since he was a shepard. For Cain, this was his first batch of crops. Each gave up what they thought was meaningful, but God only took favor on Abel, and out of jealousy, Cain kills him. While this may seem irrational, I always imagined what it would be like to live my entire life to impress and meet my most admired idol who I have been told did so many amazing things for me, and after all this time he deems my gift worthy despite it being the most worthwhile thing I could give. I don't know if I would have killed my brother over it, but to me the motivation makes sense. Maybe he was a bad person before this incident, maybe he wasn't, but the point is that it's plausible this could have happened to any person. And in the end, even after being banished from the world, he proves to have had a pretty decent life and lineage, with the message being that even the worst men will be forgiven under god's eyes (though this is speculation on my part).

The N-Town Play takes all of that complexity away in my opinion. To start off, Abel is now this noble and honorable son and worshiper of God. When Adam gives him instructions on the sacrifices, Abel thanks his father, saying "Gramercy, father, for your good doctrine, for as you teach us, so shall we do" (45-46). Cain on the other hand is this an arrogant, stuck up punk, who literally is already packing up to go home before Adam finishes his instructions. When choosing his sacrifice, he chooses a field that is of no use to him, since God won't be able to eat it anyway, he won't know it's a bad field. The N-Town Play takes this idea that anyone, given the proper motivation, can do evil into a tragic Mary Sue gets killed by evil brother. The punishment, while in both is justified, lacks the tragedy that comes with knowing that Cain was just trying to be a good follower.

Comments

  1. It is certainly an interesting point that if we look at the original story in Genesis, it is not really said that Cain was acting out of malice towards God. I never thought of it this way because most versions of the story that I know portray Cain as someone who was purposefully giving God a bad offering. Thus, it is interesting that this change is so widespread in later versions (such as N-town) and that the story has evolved to feature this fact so prominently.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great observations on the varied portrayal of Cain's nature between these two versions of the story. Though I believe it remains a mystery whether God forgives Cain eventually in Genesis, I agree that the N-town version of the story provides more detailed explanations from Cain's perspectives so that it helps the audience of the play to relate the situation to themselves, serving as a good moral teaching.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts